Wednesday, July 17, 2019
A Framework for Sustainable Port Security Essay
This look was conducted to determine the best ways in which United States fag end nourish its bearings which argon the main first of economic link with the world from terrorist struggles. The research question that implies present is How im larboardant ports are for the U. S thriftiness? And what measures bunghole be taken to protect ports from terrorist antiaircraft guns with out(p) affecting the economic activities? Is there a hypo thesis or thesis or central argument that is intelligibly express or implied? If so, what is it?The central argument was clearly portrayed and it depicted that even though a port may be turn overed as a collection of assets barely the port actually is a Gordian outline consisting of loosely coupled hoagie agreements, Secondly importance of organisational interrelations that innate exist in order to vitiate the acts of terrorist act and difficulties in bringing unneurotic the private and public entities that be in possession o f a stake in port trade protection clay and finally the negative advert on thrift that aptitude spend due to port earnest measures interventions essential be unsounded and curtailed.Does the rootage conclude the So what? Were you convinced that the view was deserving doing? The research provided a brief insinuate of how terrorist threats should be dealt with and it demonstrated how set of gage interventions can be classified in respect of how they will affect the economy. It alike identified that the primary aim of terrorist is to offend our economic viability of ports and maritime systems. So security measures should be designed in a way that they do non victimize the economy. Is the get wind unmatched in either way?The study was unique in a way that it defined the failing differ in threat, type of attack and potential consequences of all(prenominal) wedgesection one by one implying that happen reduction intervention should be different for each sub sy stem. The system was divided into four sub systems which are as honours Containerized cargo Petrochemical cargo great deal cargo Ferry passengers The owners and operators of containers are accredited as they are established companies and sustain a fix route and docket the threat comes from the lack of ability to position what is inside the container as these containers are sealed. constitution interventions should be designed in a way that they identify, track and secure the circumscribe of container. The threat to petrochemical subsystem is that fire/explosion can be caused by two attack on the vessel containing dangerous strong or the hijacking and use of vessel as a weapon. The counsel should plug that the vessels are operated by bank operators and it should augment the marine and terminal fire contend capabilities in order to deal with any hazardous consequences.Bulk cargos are not owned by reliable operators so measures should be taken to stir the system o f ownership more transparent the cargos should be inspected before arriving to the port and a trusted shipper program should be shaped in an attempt to deal with these uncertainties. Ferries are topically owned and operated by government authorities, the terrorist attacks on these ferries can cause mass decease so the passengers and vehicles should be inspected properly and they enquire a mass casualty repartee which is not available in virtually ports. What are the main points of the condition? spare-time activity are the main points of phrase The grand part of US trade is drug-addicted upon shipping (Ports and maritime systems) and it is the main source of economic connection with the world. The aim of terrorist attacks on US ports is to destroy the US economy Emphasis should be presumption to organizational interrelationships in order to avoid acts of terrorism The port security should involve a step by step function and the terrorist attacks should be looked as a cooking stove starting from threat factors and ending at the delayed consequences that the attack will have. The hot scenario of defense is poor because the accountable authorities are less likely to be informed about report of fast threats, secondly the weaknesses associated with the complex economic system are not properly understood and the risks are not easier to anticipate accurately. A port consists of different sub systems and each sub system requires different security measures. Each port has different sub system, an important step in find the vulnerability of a particular port is the learning of which sub system is direct in that port.This information is excessively essential to design a consequence management system for each port. What kind of belles-lettres review is provided and/or what sources are cited? How tumesce does it fulfill that part? Following are the major sources of information for the study Barriers to port security Perspectives on the use o f risk assessment to address terrorism act of terrorism as hazard a new species of trouble Crisis and emergency management Organizing for fatherland securities. The sources were perfectly in line with the end of study and were quite helpful in finding out the essential information which was needed for the study.The literature review provided was of both qualitative and quantitative nature which make the arguments more strong How well does the author explain their method of store and analyzing selective information? Could you replicate the study based upon the article before you? The method of collecting and analyzing the information was not clearly mentioned in the study and it could have been better and much easier for the readers to make judgments if the author would have defined the methods of collecting and analyzing the data. Is there any discussion of variables?Is so, how? Does the Author look at alternative points of view? The author did not look at the alternative p oints of view which could have do the study more interesting and praiseworthily there was ambiguity regarding the discussion of variables, unbosom the study was worth doing and appreciable. Do the studies findings hurt the authors Goals or Thesis? How valid are they? The study was in line with the thesis and it strand out that how significant US ports are for the economy and how important it is to ruminate a separate security strategy for each port.The importance of organizational interrelationship was defined and the author discussed the responsibilities of each assign in order to strengthen the organizational interrelationships. The study supported the thesis by answering the negative impact that US economy will have if security interventions are not planned adequately. The figures that were given regarding the risk management approach, organizational interventions and responsibilities were also helpful in tracking the threats and simulated military operation to deal with those threats.However, the main emphasis of the study was on the physical attributes of the port and the specialty between each port. The study found out that different security models can be prepared by study the cost associated for applying the model versus its rough-and-readyness, but the purpose is not to prepare a enumerate of models but to find out the closely cost effective model. Does the polish follow from the evidence provided? Are you persuaded by it? why or Why Not? The conclusion followed the findings of the study and described the danger of terrorist threats to US ports and the reason behind these threats is to hurt the US economy.So the security measures should be taken in away that they dont dent the economy. Does the Author address the implications of these results? If so, how comprehensively is this make? The author looked at the broader perspectives and pointed out the areas which are needed to be locomote upon but in depth abridgment of each aspect was n ot make the author touched different issues which were needful and essential to curtail the possibility of dangerous consequences and the adverse effects that terrorism might have on the economy.Do you distinguish other strengths and limitations of this study? The study was done in an organized manner and quantitative figures and solid sources were used to make the article stronger the usage of diagrams also made it unique and substantial. However, more up to date sources could have made the research more effective and worthy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.