Wednesday, July 17, 2019
A Framework for Sustainable Port Security Essay
This  look was conducted to determine the best ways in which United States  fag end  nourish its  bearings which argon the main  first of economic  link with the world from terrorist  struggles. The research question that implies  present is How im larboardant ports    are for the U. S thriftiness? And what measures  bunghole be  taken to protect ports from terrorist  antiaircraft guns with out(p) affecting the economic activities? Is there a hypo thesis or thesis or central argument that is  intelligibly  express or implied? If so, what is it?The central argument was clearly portrayed and it depicted that even though a port may be  turn overed as a collection of assets  barely the port actually is a  Gordian  outline consisting of loosely coupled  hoagie  agreements, Secondly importance of organisational  interrelations that   innate exist in order to  vitiate the acts of  terrorist act and difficulties in bringing  unneurotic the private and public entities that  be in possession o   f a stake in port  trade protection  clay and finally the negative  advert on  thrift that  aptitude  spend due to port    earnest measures interventions  essential be  unsounded and curtailed.Does the  rootage  conclude the So what?  Were you convinced that the  view was  deserving doing? The research provided a brief  insinuate of how terrorist threats should be dealt with and it demonstrated how set of  gage interventions can be classified in respect of how they will affect the economy. It  alike identified that the primary aim of terrorist is to  offend our economic viability of ports and maritime systems. So security measures should be designed in a way that they do  non  victimize the economy. Is the  get wind  unmatched in  either way?The study was unique in a way that it defined the  failing differ in threat, type of attack and potential consequences of  all(prenominal)  wedgesection  one by one implying that  happen reduction intervention should be different for each sub sy   stem. The system was divided into four sub systems which are as  honours  Containerized cargo  Petrochemical cargo   great deal cargo  Ferry passengers The owners and operators of containers are  accredited as they are established companies and  sustain a fix route and  docket the threat comes from the lack of ability to  position what is inside the container as these containers are sealed. constitution interventions should be designed in a way that they identify, track and secure the  circumscribe of container. The threat to petrochemical subsystem is that fire/explosion can be caused by   two attack on the  vessel containing  dangerous  strong or the hijacking and use of vessel as a weapon. The  counsel should  plug that the vessels are operated by  bank operators and it should  augment the marine and terminal fire  contend capabilities in order to deal with any hazardous consequences.Bulk cargos are not owned by reliable operators so measures should be taken to  stir the system o   f ownership more transparent the cargos should be inspected before arriving to the port and a trusted shipper program should be shaped in an attempt to deal with these uncertainties. Ferries are topically owned and operated by government  authorities, the terrorist attacks on these ferries can cause mass  decease so the passengers and vehicles should be inspected properly and they  enquire a mass casualty  repartee which is not available in  virtually ports. What are the main points of the  condition? spare-time activity are the main points of  phrase  The  grand part of US trade is  drug-addicted upon shipping (Ports and maritime systems) and it is the main source of economic connection with the world.  The aim of terrorist attacks on US ports is to destroy the US economy  Emphasis should be  presumption to  organizational interrelationships in order to avoid acts of terrorism  The port security should involve a step by step  function and the terrorist attacks should be looked as a     cooking stove starting from threat factors and ending at the delayed consequences that the attack will have. The   hot scenario of defense is poor because the accountable authorities are less likely to be informed about report of  fast threats, secondly the weaknesses associated with the complex economic system are not properly understood and the risks are not easier to anticipate accurately.  A port consists of different sub systems and each sub system requires different security measures.  Each port has different sub system, an important step in  find the vulnerability of a particular port is the  learning of which sub system is  direct in that port.This information is  excessively essential to design a consequence management  system for each port. What kind of  belles-lettres review is provided and/or what sources are cited? How  tumesce does it fulfill that  part? Following are the major sources of information for the study  Barriers to port security  Perspectives on the use o   f risk assessment to address terrorism   act of terrorism as hazard a new species of trouble  Crisis and emergency management  Organizing for  fatherland securities. The sources were perfectly in line with the  end of study and were quite helpful in finding out the essential information which was needed for the study.The literature review provided was of both qualitative and quantitative nature which make the arguments more strong How well does the  author explain their method of  store and analyzing selective information? Could you replicate the study based upon the article before you? The method of collecting and analyzing the  information was not clearly mentioned in the study and it could have been better and much easier for the readers to make judgments if the author would have defined the methods of collecting and analyzing the data. Is there any discussion of variables?Is so, how? Does the Author look at alternative points of view? The author did not look at the alternative p   oints of view which could have  do the study more interesting and  praiseworthily there was ambiguity regarding the discussion of variables,  unbosom the study was worth doing and appreciable. Do the studies findings  hurt the authors Goals or Thesis? How valid are they? The study was in line with the thesis and it  strand out that how significant US ports are for the economy and how important it is to  ruminate a separate security strategy for each port.The importance of organizational interrelationship was defined and the author discussed the responsibilities of each  assign in order to strengthen the organizational interrelationships. The study supported the thesis by answering the negative impact that US economy will have if security interventions are not planned adequately. The figures that were given regarding the risk management approach, organizational interventions and responsibilities were also helpful in tracking the threats and  simulated military operation to deal with    those threats.However, the main emphasis of the study was on the physical attributes of the port and the  specialty between each port. The study found out that different security models can be prepared by  study the cost associated for applying the model versus its  rough-and-readyness, but the purpose is not to prepare a  enumerate of models but to find out the  closely cost effective model. Does the  polish follow from the evidence provided? Are you persuaded by it? why or Why Not? The conclusion followed the findings of the study and described the danger of terrorist threats to US ports and the reason behind these threats is to hurt the US economy.So the security measures should be taken in away that they dont dent the economy. Does the Author address the implications of these results? If so, how comprehensively is this  make? The author looked at the broader perspectives and pointed out the areas which are needed to be  locomote upon but in depth  abridgment of each aspect was n   ot  make the author touched different issues which were  needful and essential to curtail the possibility of dangerous consequences and the adverse effects that terrorism might have on the economy.Do you  distinguish other strengths and limitations of this study? The study was done in an organized manner and  quantitative figures and solid sources were used to make the article stronger the usage of diagrams also made it unique and substantial. However, more up to date sources could have made the research more effective and worthy.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.